What is JAL Crane Mark?什么是 JAL Crane Mark？

Curio · Updated更新于 2026-07-05

The JAL crane mark reduced an entire airline's identity to a single red bird inside a circle — proof that in mid-century corporate design, subtraction was the strongest possible statement.日航的鹤丸标志把整个航空公司的身份浓缩进一个圆圈里的一只红色仙鹤——证明在中世纪企业设计中，减法本身就是最有力的宣言。

JAL Crane Mark in briefJAL Crane Mark 速览

This style is built around a single emblem: a red-crowned crane, drawn in the negative-space logic of a Japanese family crest, folded into a perfect circle. It is not a palette in the way many design systems are palettes — it is closer to a discipline of restraint, in which one mark, one saturated red, and one cool, quiet field are treated as sufficient. Everything else in the system exists to protect that mark, not to compete with it.这种风格的核心只有一个图形：一只红色丹顶鹤，以日本家纹惯用的负空间手法画成，收拢进一个正圆之内。它不像大多数设计系统那样以“色板”定义自己——它更接近一种克制的纪律：一个标记、一种饱和的红、一片偏冷而安静的底面，被视为已经足够。系统里的其它一切都是为了守护这个标记的完整，而不是与它争夺注意力。

The visual language that follows from this emblem favors flat, unmodulated color over gradients, hard geometric containment over loose illustration, and generous, deliberate emptiness over dense composition. Where many corporate identities of the same era leaned on multiple colors, mascots, or slogans stacked around a logotype, this one insists that a single figure, correctly drawn, needs no reinforcement. The red of the crane is not decorative — it functions the way a seal or a stamp functions, a mark of authenticity rather than an accent color.由此衍生出的视觉语言偏爱平涂色块而非渐变，偏爱硬边几何的收束而非松散的插画，偏爱大量刻意留出的空白而非密集的构图。同时代许多企业形象喜欢在标志周围叠加多种颜色、吉祥物或标语，这套系统却坚持：一个画得准确的图形，不需要任何加固。鹤的红色并非装饰性的点缀色——它的作用更接近印章：一个真伪的凭证，而非配色方案里的一抹亮色。

Typography plays a supporting role rather than a starring one. Clean, geometric sans-serif letterforms carry Latin-alphabet labeling, while a parallel set of humanist Japanese sans-serifs carries native-language text, and neither is permitted to compete visually with the crane mark itself. The overall effect reads as calm, exact, and slightly formal — an aesthetic built for institutions that needed to look instantly recognizable at the scale of an airport tail fin and legible at the scale of a boarding pass, without ever changing its essential form.字体在这里扮演的是配角而非主角。干净的几何无衬线字体承载拉丁字母标签，一套人文风格的日文无衬线字体与之并行承载日语文本，二者都被要求绝不与鹤丸本身争夺视线。整体气质是沉静、精确，略带正式感——这是一种为需要在机身尾翼那样的尺度上一眼可辨、又要在登机牌那样的尺度上依然清晰的机构量身打造的美学，而且无论尺度如何变化，图形本身从不走形。

JAL Crane Mark design style applied to a Article page

See the JAL Crane Mark design system查看 JAL Crane Mark 完整设计系统

Where does JAL Crane Mark come from?JAL Crane Mark 从何而来？

The mark at the center of this style — known in Japanese as the Tsurumaru, literally the 'crane circle' — was designed by the American graphic designer Jerry Huff and adopted by Japan Air Lines in 1959, though the design itself dates to 1958. Its arrival came at a pivotal moment: JAL had been founded in 1951 and spent the 1950s expanding from domestic routes into an international carrier, and it needed an identity that could travel as far as its aircraft did — reading clearly on a runway in Tokyo and a ticket counter in San Francisco alike.这套风格的核心图形——日文称作“鶴丸”，字面意思是“鹤的圆圈”——由美国平面设计师杰瑞·赫夫设计，1959 年被日本航空正式采用，尽管设计本身完成于 1958 年。它的到来正值这家航空公司的关键节点：日航成立于 1951 年，整个 1950 年代都在从国内航线扩张为国际航空公司，因此迫切需要一套能够像它的飞机一样飞得更远的视觉身份——一套在东京的跑道上和旧金山的售票柜台前都能被同样清晰地识别的标志。

The choice of a crane was not arbitrary. The red-crowned crane, or tancho, holds a long-standing place in Japanese visual and cultural tradition as a symbol of longevity, good fortune, and grace, appearing in classical painting, textile pattern, and ceremonial crest design for centuries before this mark existed. By taking a culturally resonant bird and rendering it with the formal logic of a kamon, the hereditary family crest tradition of Japanese heraldry, Huff's design tapped into a visual grammar Japanese audiences already understood: a single creature, silhouetted and simplified until it reads as a clean emblem rather than a naturalistic drawing, held inside a perfect enclosing shape.选择仙鹤并非偶然。丹顶鹤在日本视觉与文化传统中长期占据着长寿、吉祥与优雅的象征地位——早在这个标志诞生的几个世纪之前，它就已出现在古典绘画、织物纹样与仪礼纹章设计之中。赫夫把这只文化上极具共鸣的鸟，用“家纹”（日本纹章体系中世代相传的家族徽记传统）那套形式逻辑重新绘制，正好接通了日本受众早已心领神会的一套视觉语法：一种生物，被剪影化、简化，直到它读起来像一枚洁净的徽记而非写实的图画，再被收纳进一个完美的外框形状之中。

That kamon logic is worth dwelling on, because it explains why the mark works the way it does. Japanese family crests are built on radical reduction — a plant, an animal, or an object is abstracted into flat, symmetrical, high-contrast forms designed to be identifiable from a distance on a banner or garment, then disciplined further into a circular boundary. The Tsurumaru borrows that method whole: the crane's wings are stylized rather than anatomically rendered, the silhouette is built from negative space as much as positive space, and the circle does the work a crest boundary always did, turning a living creature into a fixed, repeatable, stamp-like sign.这套家纹逻辑值得多说几句，因为它解释了这个标志为何如此有效。日本家纹建立在极端的简化之上——一株植物、一种动物或一件器物被抽象成扁平、对称、高对比度的形态，为的是能在旗帜或衣物上被远距离一眼辨认，然后再被进一步收束进一个圆形或近似圆形的边界之内。鶴丸整套借用了这一方法：鹤的双翼被程式化而非按解剖结构描绘，剪影本身由负空间与正空间共同构筑而成，而外围的那个圆，完成的正是纹章边界一贯的工作——把一个活生生的生物，变成一个固定的、可无限复制的、如印章般的符号。

The mark's introduction sits within a broader wave of mid-century corporate-identity minimalism, when airlines, broadcasters, and manufacturers worldwide began replacing descriptive, illustrative logos with single abstracted marks applicable consistently across media — a livery, a letterhead, a matchbook. What distinguishes the Tsurumaru is how openly it drew on a specific national craft tradition rather than the more geometric, Bauhaus-descended abstraction favored by many Western corporations of the same decades, giving JAL an identity modern in method and unmistakably Japanese in source.这一标志的诞生，处在更大范围的“中世纪企业识别极简主义”浪潮之中——那是一个航空公司、广播机构与跨国制造商纷纷用单一、抽象的标记取代描述性、插画式旧标志的年代，为的是能在机身涂装、信纸抬头、火柴盒等极为不同的媒介上都保持一致的年代。鶴丸在这股浪潮中的特别之处在于，它如此坦然地取材于一种特定的民族工艺传统，而非同年代许多西方企业更青睐的、承袭自包豪斯的几何抽象——这让日航获得了一种方法上极其现代、而出处又毫不含糊地属于日本的身份。

What defines the JAL Crane Mark look?JAL Crane Mark 的视觉特征是什么？

The Single Mark唯一图形

The entire system defers to one emblem — the crane inside its circle — treated as complete and non-negotiable. There is no secondary logo, no alternate mascot, no supporting icon set competing for the same visual role. Any application of this style should protect that hierarchy: one dominant mark, everything else subordinate to it.整套系统只服从一个图形——圆圈里的那只鹤——被视为完整且不容更改。没有次级标志，没有替代吉祥物，没有与之争夺同一视觉位置的图标组。运用这种风格时应当保护这层层级：一个绝对主导的图形，其余一切都居于其下。

Color色彩

The palette is deliberately narrow: one saturated, warm red carried almost entirely by the mark itself, set against a cool, quiet off-white or near-white field. There is no second hue competing for attention and no gradient softening the red into anything less absolute. Color here behaves like ink on paper — a single decisive stroke against a calm ground, rather than a system of many coordinated tones.色板刻意收得极窄：一种饱和、偏暖的红，几乎完全由图形本身承载，衬在一片偏冷、安静的灰白或近白底面之上。没有第二种色相来分散注意力，也没有渐变把这抹红软化成任何不够绝对的东西。这里的色彩表现得像纸上的墨——一笔果断的落墨，衬在沉静的底色上，而非一套由多种协调色调组成的体系。

Negative Space as Craft负空间即工艺

The crane's form is built as much from what is left unfilled as from what is drawn — wings and body emerge from carefully cut absences within the circle, in the same manner a traditional crest silhouette resolves a creature from negative shape. Applying this style well means treating empty space as an active compositional tool, not as leftover background waiting to be filled.鹤的形态，由留白部分构筑的分量并不亚于落笔部分——双翼与躯干，是从圆圈内经过精心切割的空缺中浮现出来的，正如传统纹章剪影总是靠负形来解析出一个生物。要用好这种风格，意味着把空白当作一种主动的构图工具来对待，而不是等着被填满的剩余背景。

The Enclosing Circle外围圆圈

The circle is not a frame added after the fact — it is structural, performing the same containment role a family crest boundary always performed: turning a living, irregular subject into a fixed, symmetrical, repeatable sign. Anything drawn in this style should feel like it has been disciplined into its container, not merely placed inside one.这个圆圈不是事后添加的边框——它是结构性的，扮演着家纹边界一贯扮演的收束角色：把一个活的、不规则的主体，转化为一个固定、对称、可重复使用的符号。用这种风格绘制的任何图形，都应当给人一种被收束进容器的感觉，而不只是被随意放进容器里。

Typography as Support字体为辅

Type is present but deliberately quiet: clean geometric sans-serifs for Latin labeling, paired with humanist Japanese sans-serifs for native text, both kept restrained in weight and scale so neither competes with the mark. Labels sit near the emblem the way a caption sits near a photograph — informative, never decorative, never louder than the thing it describes.字体确实存在，但刻意保持安静：干净的几何无衬线字体用于拉丁字母标签，配以人文风格的日文无衬线字体承载本地文字，两者的字重与尺度都被克制在一定范围内，以免与图形争夺视线。标签靠近图形的方式，就像图片说明靠近照片——起说明作用，从不装饰，也绝不比它所描述的对象更响亮。

Flatness, No Shadow扁平，无投影

There is no drop shadow, no bevel, no simulated dimensionality anywhere in the system — the mark sits flat against its field the way a stamped seal sits flat against paper. This flatness is not an aesthetic default so much as a fidelity to the mark's origins as a crest: crests are printed and embroidered flat, and this style preserves that flatness even in digital contexts.整套系统里没有投影，没有斜切，没有任何模拟立体感的处理——图形平贴在底面上，就像一枚印章平贴在纸面上。这种扁平并非单纯的审美默认，更是对图形作为“纹章”这一出身的忠实：纹章向来是以平面的方式印刷或刺绣的，而这种风格即便到了数字语境中，依然保留了这份扁平。

Generous Emptiness慷慨的留白

The field surrounding the mark is treated as important in its own right, not as unused margin. Large areas of quiet off-white give the crane room to be read at a glance, at any scale, without visual noise nearby competing for attention. Compositions in this style should feel unhurried, even sparse, by design.图形周围的底面被当作本身就重要的部分来对待，而不是尚未使用的边距。大片安静的灰白留出足够的空间，让这只鹤能在任何尺度下都被一眼读出，附近没有视觉噪音与之争夺注意力。这种风格下的构图理应显得从容，甚至疏朗——这是设计本身的意图，而非疏漏。

JAL Crane Mark design style applied to a Dashboard

See the JAL Crane Mark design system查看 JAL Crane Mark 完整设计系统

Who shaped JAL Crane Mark?谁塑造了 JAL Crane Mark？

Jerry Huff

Huff is credited as the designer of the Tsurumaru mark, completing the design in 1958 ahead of its 1959 trademark registration by Japan Air Lines. Working as an American designer on a mark intended to represent a Japanese national carrier, he drew directly on the formal conventions of the kamon crest tradition rather than imposing an unrelated Western design vocabulary, producing an emblem that has remained in continuous use for decades with only minor refinement — an unusually long life for a piece of corporate identity design.赫夫是鶴丸标志的设计者，1958 年完成设计，1959 年由日本航空正式注册为商标。作为一名为日本国家级航空公司操刀标志的美国设计师，他直接取材于家纹这一纹章传统的形式惯例，而没有强加一套与之无关的西方设计词汇，由此产生了一枚数十年间只经过细微调整、便持续沿用至今的徽记——对于一件企业识别设计而言，这样的生命周期极为罕见。

Japan Air Lines (as institutional author)

JAL, founded in 1951, adopted the Tsurumaru in 1959 as it transitioned from a domestic operator into an international airline, and the mark became one of the most recognized national-carrier symbols to emerge from postwar Japan. Its consistent use across aircraft livery, ticketing, and printed materials for decades demonstrates how a single, disciplined mark can outlast the design trends of any one era.日本航空成立于 1951 年，1959 年采用鶴丸标志，正值它从一家国内航空公司转型为国际航空公司之际，这枚标志也由此成为战后日本最具辨识度的国家级航空公司符号之一。它在机身涂装、票务与印刷物料上历经数十年的持续沿用，证明了一个足够克制、足够单一的图形，能够超越任何一个时代的设计潮流。

The Kamon (Japanese Crest) Tradition

Though not a single individual, the centuries-old kamon system of Japanese heraldic design is the direct formal ancestor of this style. Kamon reduce plants, animals, and objects to flat, symmetrical, high-contrast emblems bounded by a simple enclosing shape, built for instant recognition from a distance — the exact set of formal problems the Tsurumaru had to solve for a modern international airline.尽管并非某一位具体人物，历经数百年的日本家纹纹章体系，是这种风格在形式上的直接先祖。家纹把植物、动物与器物简化为扁平、对称、高对比度、由简单外框收束的徽记，为的是能在远距离被瞬间辨认——而这恰恰是鶴丸为一家现代国际航空公司所必须解决的同一套形式课题。

The Red-Crowned Crane (Tancho) in Japanese Visual Culture

The bird itself functions almost as a co-author of the mark's meaning. Long associated with longevity, fidelity, and good fortune across Japanese painting, textile design, and ceremonial art, the tancho brought centuries of accumulated cultural resonance to the mark before a single line of the logo was ever drawn, giving the design an emotional register that pure geometric abstraction could not have supplied on its own.这只鸟本身，几乎可以说是这枚标志意义的“共同作者”。丹顶鹤在日本绘画、织物设计与仪礼艺术中，长久以来与长寿、忠贞、吉祥相关联——在标志的第一笔线条落下之前，它就已经为这个设计带来了数百年积累的文化共鸣，赋予了这个设计一种纯粹几何抽象本身无法单独提供的情感基调。

How do you use JAL Crane Mark today?今天怎么用 JAL Crane Mark？

This style transfers cleanly into presentation design because its logic is already about hierarchy through restraint. A cover slide should carry one centered or off-center emblem-like mark on a calm, near-white field, with a title set in quiet, controlled type below or beside it — resisting the urge to add a second graphic for balance. Content and data slides should follow the same discipline: a single accent color, echoing the mark's saturated red, reserved for the one number or data point that matters most, while every supporting figure stays in a neutral ink tone. Charts should favor one flat, saturated accent against a quiet ground rather than a multi-color palette of segments.这种风格能顺畅地移植进演示文稿设计，因为它的逻辑本身就是关于“靠克制建立层级”。封面页应当在一片安静的近白底面上，居中或偏置放置一个类似徽记的单一图形，标题以安静、克制的字体设于其下方或一侧——克制住为了“平衡”而添加第二个图形的冲动。内容页与数据页应遵循同样的纪律：把唯一的强调色（呼应图形那种饱和的红）只留给最重要的那个数字或数据点，其余信息都保持在中性的墨色调里。图表应偏好在安静底色上使用单一的平涂强调色，而非用多种颜色区分区块。

For web interfaces, particularly dashboards and pricing pages, the style rewards the same single-accent approach: a near-white or warm-white background, black text for all body and label content, and the saturated red reserved exclusively for the one interactive element the interface most wants noticed — a primary call-to-action, an active tab, a highlighted pricing tier. Every other control should stay quiet, bordered rather than filled, so the red element keeps its authority instead of competing with a dozen equally loud buttons. Icons should stay flat and geometric, with no hint of depth that would break the system's stamp-like flatness.对于网页界面，尤其是仪表板与定价页面，这种风格适合同样的“单一强调色”思路：近白或暖白的背景，正文与标签一律用黑色，而那种饱和的红只留给界面最想让用户注意到的那一个交互元素——一个主要的行动号召按钮、一个当前激活的标签页、一个被突出显示的定价档位。其余控件都应保持安静，用边框而非填充呈现，这样红色元素才能保住权威感，而不必与十几个同样响亮的按钮竞争。图标应保持扁平与几何化，避免任何暗示深度的处理。

In editorial and marketing contexts, the style suits any brand communicating confidence through economy rather than volume — a single strong mark on a generous field says more than a page full of supporting graphics. A marketing page might use one large-format emblem-like graphic as a hero image, paired with brief copy and a single red call-to-action, resisting the instinct to add secondary colors or decorative flourishes around it. Editorial layouts benefit from the same generous negative space seen in the mark itself: wide margins, one restrained column of body text, and a deliberate red accent for a pull-quote rather than color scattered throughout the page.在编辑与营销语境中，这种风格适合任何希望以“经济”而非“音量”传达自信的品牌——一片慷慨留白之上的一个有力图形，能比满页的辅助图形说出更多。营销页面可以用一个大尺寸的、类似徽记的图形作为主视觉，配以简短文案与一个红色的行动号召按钮，抵制住添加第二种颜色或装饰性花饰的本能。编辑版面同样受益于图形本身那种慷慨的负空间：宽阔页边距，一栏克制的正文，以及一处用于引言的红色强调，而非散落在页面各处的色彩。

The style also suits any context needing a mark that must scale cleanly — recognizable whether reproduced enormous, as on an aircraft tail, or tiny, as on a favicon. Anyone borrowing this idiom for identity work should test the emblem at extreme size reduction; if it stops reading clearly at very small scale, it has likely kept too much detail and needs further reduction toward the flat, crest-like silhouette the style depends on.这种风格也适合任何需要图形“能干净缩放”的场景——无论放大到飞机尾翼的尺度，还是缩小到网页图标的尺度，都依然可辨。借用这套语汇的人，应当在极小尺寸下测试徽记：如果它在极小尺度下不再清晰，多半说明保留了过多细节，需要进一步简化。

The most common mistake is treating red as a general brand color sprinkled throughout a layout — on multiple buttons, in headers, in decorative bands — rather than reserving it almost entirely for the single mark or the one most important action on a page. This idiom's authority comes specifically from red's scarcity. A second common error is adding shadow or gloss to the emblem to make it feel more dimensional; doing so breaks the flat, stamped quality that is the entire point of drawing from crest tradition.最常见的错误，是把红色当作可以在版面各处随意点缀的“品牌色”——用在多个按钮上、页眉里、装饰性色带中——而不是几乎完全留给唯一的图形，或页面上最重要的那个动作。这套语汇的权威感，恰恰来自红色的稀缺。第二个常见错误，是给徽记加上投影或光泽，试图让它更有立体感；这样做会破坏那种平贴、如印章般的质感——而这正是取材于纹章传统的全部意义所在。

JAL Crane Mark design style applied to a Slide · cover

See the JAL Crane Mark design system查看 JAL Crane Mark 完整设计系统

JAL Crane Mark — FAQJAL Crane Mark · 常见问题

Is this the same as minimalism in general?这和一般意义上的“极简主义”是一回事吗？

It overlaps with minimalism but is more specific than that label suggests. General minimalism can mean many things — a reduced color count, a sparse layout, an absence of ornament. This style is minimalism in service of a single emblem drawn from a particular tradition, Japanese crest design, and it treats the emblem's clarity as the entire point rather than one design choice among several. A minimalist layout with no central mark at all is not really working in this idiom; the discipline exists to protect one specific figure, not emptiness for its own sake.它与极简主义有重叠，但比这个标签所暗示的要具体得多。泛泛而言的极简主义可以指很多事——色彩数量的减少、版面的疏朗、装饰的缺席。而这种风格是为了服务于取材自一种特定传统（日本纹章设计）的单一图形而存在的极简，它把图形本身的清晰度当作全部要点，而不是众多设计选择中的一项。一个完全没有中心图形的极简版面，其实并不算真正运用了这套语汇；这份克制的存在，是为了守护某一个特定的图形，而不是为了空无本身。

Why is only one color used so strictly?为什么只严格使用一种颜色？

Because the red functions as a seal of authenticity rather than a decorative accent, and a seal loses its authority the moment it is diluted across many surfaces. The historical logic comes directly from the crest tradition this style draws on: a family crest was typically rendered in a single ink or thread color precisely so it could be reproduced identically and recognized instantly, regardless of medium. Introducing a second or third color would undercut that function, turning a mark of authenticity into an ordinary decorative graphic.因为这抹红扮演的是真伪印章的角色，而非装饰性的点缀色，一枚印章一旦被稀释到许多表面上，就会失去它的权威性。这背后的历史逻辑，正来自这种风格所取材的纹章传统：家纹通常只用单一的墨色或丝线颜色来呈现，正是为了无论媒介如何变化，都能被完全一致地复制、被瞬间辨认。一旦引入第二种或第三种颜色，就会削弱这个功能，把一枚真伪印章变成一件普通的装饰性图形。

Can this style work with imagery or photography?这种风格能与图像或摄影搭配使用吗？

Sparingly, and only if the photography itself stays quiet. Because the entire system is built to let one emblem dominate an otherwise calm field, any photography introduced alongside it should be desaturated or kept to a narrow tonal range, used in small, contained placements rather than as a dominant background. Busy, colorful, or high-contrast photography competing with the mark for attention works against the style's core logic and should generally be avoided in favor of restrained, documentary-style imagery if photography is needed at all.可以谨慎地搭配，但前提是摄影本身也要保持安静。由于整套系统的设计初衷，就是让一个图形在原本平静的底面上占据主导地位，任何随之引入的摄影都应当降低饱和度，或控制在较窄的色调范围内，以小尺寸、被收束的方式出现，而非作为主导性的背景。喧闹、色彩浓烈或高对比度、与图形争夺注意力的摄影，会与这种风格的核心逻辑相悖，如果确实需要摄影元素，通常应当选择克制的、纪实风格的图像。

Does this style suit every kind of brand, or are there contexts where it struggles?这种风格适合所有类型的品牌吗？有没有它表现欠佳的场景？

It suits brands and products where trust, consistency, and instant recognizability across scale are the primary values — airlines, institutions, and any product that needs a single mark to remain legible from a tail fin to a favicon. It struggles in contexts that call for variety, playfulness, or frequent visual refresh, since the entire discipline depends on one mark staying essentially unchanged for a very long time. A brand that wants to experiment seasonally with color or imagery, or one whose personality depends on visual abundance rather than restraint, will find this idiom's rules constraining rather than useful.它适合信任感、一致性、以及跨尺度的瞬间可辨认性是首要价值的品牌与产品——航空公司、各类机构，以及任何需要同一个图形从飞机尾翼到网页图标都保持可辨的产品。它在需要多样性、趣味性或频繁视觉更新的场景中则会力不从心，因为这整套纪律都依赖于同一个图形在很长一段时间里基本保持不变。一个希望随季节尝试不同颜色或图像的品牌，或者一个个性依赖于视觉丰富度而非克制的品牌，会发现这套语汇的规则束缚大于帮助。

What is the relationship between this style and Japanese kamon (family crest) design more broadly?这种风格与更广义的日本家纹（家族纹章）设计是什么关系？

This style is best understood as a single, highly successful modern application of kamon principles rather than a kamon itself. Traditional kamon identify families and are passed down through generations attached to specific lineages; this mark instead identifies a modern commercial institution, applying the same formal method — reduction to flat silhouette, containment within a simple enclosing shape, use of negative space to resolve form — to a new kind of subject. Anyone drawing on this style is essentially borrowing a centuries-old formal discipline and pointing it at a contemporary brand problem.理解这种风格最恰当的方式，是把它看作家纹原则的一次高度成功的现代应用，而非家纹本身。传统家纹用于标识家族，附着于特定血脉世代相传；而这枚标志标识的则是一个现代商业机构，它把同样的形式方法——简化为扁平剪影、收束进简单的外框、用负空间解析形态——运用到了一种全新的对象之上。任何借用这种风格的人，本质上都是在借用一套历经数百年的形式纪律，去解决一个当代的品牌问题。

Get the full JAL Crane Mark design system获取 JAL Crane Mark 完整设计系统