Essay · Craft & Slowness — Issue No. 14, autumn

On the patience of gouache, and why our studio still paints frames by hand

Six months into rotoscoping a six-minute short, our director Lyudmila stopped the projector and asked us to throw out a week of digital work. Here is what we learned about warmth, deadlines, and a brush the size of a child's finger.

Ksenia Belyaeva · Studio editor October 14, 2024·9 min read·Moscow / Tbilisi

The pigment we use is called Leningrad No. 7 — a saturated ochre the colour of a baked apricot, sold in tin cups since 1959. Last winter our colourist Vova brought three cups back from a shuttered shop on Liteyny Prospekt, and we have been rationing them like sugar through the production of The Hare Who Could Not Sleep. When the director asked for a richer amber on the meadow plates, we mixed in a little terracotta and a thumbnail of olive, and the field warmed by exactly one stop.

Why the digital version did not survive the rushes

We tried, of course. For three weeks in February the studio ran a parallel pipeline in a node-based compositor, and every plate came out clean, neutral, and a little dead. The hare looked as though he had been cut from a magazine. So we put the tablets away, cut twelve sheets of heavy Goznak paper, and began again — slower, warmer, and, by the calendar, almost on time.

This is the Soyuzmultfilm Animation design system, applied by Curio Design — a design-style library for AI agents. Full Soyuzmultfilm Animation guide → designbycurio.com/learn/soviet-soyuzmultfilm-cartoon-1969