The Destruction of Meaning
On why the refusal to explain remains the most radical gesture in contemporary practice.
In the winter of 2019, I stood inside the Aoyama flagship and watched a woman hold a garment to the light. It was a jacket — one sleeve shorter than the other, the fabric frayed at every seam. She turned it slowly, with the kind of attention usually reserved for sculpture. She did not check the price. This is the gravity that decades of conceptual practice have constructed: a space where clothing demands the same cognitive labor as art.
Against the Obvious
The problem with fashion has never been aesthetic. It is epistemological. The industry runs on a shared hallucination — that surfaces communicate truth, that a hemline can be read like a sentence. The first Paris showing introduced what critics lazily called destruction: torn garments, asymmetrical silhouettes, models who looked as though they had survived something. The press recoiled. They were right to. It was an assault on their assumptions about what clothing owed them.
“I do not care about the meaning of the garment. I care about the making.”